Login


 
Newsletter
Werbung

Thema: Canonical mit eigenem Schlüssel für Secure Boot

1 Kommentar(e) || Alle anzeigen ||  RSS || Kommentieren
Kommentare von Lesern spiegeln nicht unbedingt die Meinung der Redaktion wider.
0
Von devent am So, 24. Juni 2012 um 04:56 #

Klar, als ob sich Computerhersteller und Microsoft an irgendwelche Spezifikationen halten. Man denke nur an das Power Management und die Probleme, die es in Linux verursacht.

http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/3000/PX03020.pdf
From: Bill Gates
Send: Sunday, January 24, 1999
To: Jeff Westorinen; Ben Fathi
Cc: Carl Sork; Nathan Myhrvoid; Eric Rudder
Subject: ACPI Extensions

One thing I find myself wondering about is wether we shouldn't try and make the "ACPI" extensions somehow Windows specific.

It seems unfortunate if we do this work and get our partners to do the work and the result is that Linux works great without having to do the work.

Maybe there is no way to avoid this problem but it does bother me.

Maybe we could define the APIs so that they work well with NT and not the others even if they are open.

Or maybe we could patent something related to this.

Pro-Linux
Gewinnspiel
Neue Nachrichten
Werbung