Thema: Ausblick auf glibc 2.10
2009-04-19 11:32 am UTC (link) Delete Track This
int register_printf_modifier (wchar_t *)
No «const wchar_t *» there? Honestly, that's a non sequitur to a couple of paragraphs further up in your posting.
I'm also somewhat concerned with the abundance of XML everywhere, and the people who subvert standardisation processes to force all *nix-like operating systems to introduce things which originally were GNU glibc extensions. *sigh*
$ touch -h touch: unknown option -- h usage: touch [-acm] [-r file] [-t time] file ...
You know, that's just annoying. I wonder... strlcpy is not in POSuX 2008, but stpcpy is. How many actual BSD developers, historic or from current times, were permitted to join in the standardisation process, and how many GNU (gah! GNU's Not Unix) people were?