Von Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton am Do, 28. Juli 2016 um 01:10 #
> Das hat man schon an Purism gesehen.
****NO*****. the people behind the purism lied to everybody - including crowdsupply themselves not just the backers - about what level of "Freedom" could be attained. even i was deceived by them. they told everybody that they could get intel to give them the RSA key to the Intel treacherous backdoor co-processor which allows arbitrary and **UNDETECTABLE** remote code execution.
people like the purism team are causing huge problems for proper libre compliant systems. by total contrast you can review everything for yourself in the EOMA68 systems, and you are ***ABSOLUTELY GUARANTEED*** to have ***ALL*** source code under software libre licenses. WITHOUT EXCEPTION, all the way to the absolute bedrock at boot time.
> Das hat man schon an Purism gesehen.
****NO*****. the people behind the purism lied to everybody - including crowdsupply themselves not just the backers - about what level of "Freedom" could be attained. even i was deceived by them. they told everybody that they could get intel to give them the RSA key to the Intel treacherous backdoor co-processor which allows arbitrary and **UNDETECTABLE** remote code execution.
people like the purism team are causing huge problems for proper libre compliant systems. by total contrast you can review everything for yourself in the EOMA68 systems, and you are ***ABSOLUTELY GUARANTEED*** to have ***ALL*** source code under software libre licenses. WITHOUT EXCEPTION, all the way to the absolute bedrock at boot time.